logistic regression
PASS-GLM: polynomial approximate sufficient statistics for scalable Bayesian GLM inference
Generalized linear models (GLMs)---such as logistic regression, Poisson regression, and robust regression---provide interpretable models for diverse data types. Probabilistic approaches, particularly Bayesian ones, allow coherent estimates of uncertainty, incorporation of prior information, and sharing of power across experiments via hierarchical models. In practice, however, the approximate Bayesian methods necessary for inference have either failed to scale to large data sets or failed to provide theoretical guarantees on the quality of inference. We propose a new approach based on constructing polynomial approximate sufficient statistics for GLMs (PASS-GLM). We demonstrate that our method admits a simple algorithm as well as trivial streaming and distributed extensions that do not compound error across computations. We provide theoretical guarantees on the quality of point (MAP) estimates, the approximate posterior, and posterior mean and uncertainty estimates. We validate our approach empirically in the case of logistic regression using a quadratic approximation and show competitive performance with stochastic gradient descent, MCMC, and the Laplace approximation in terms of speed and multiple measures of accuracy---including on an advertising data set with 40 million data points and 20,000 covariates.
On Coresets for Logistic Regression
Coresets are one of the central methods to facilitate the analysis of large data. We continue a recent line of research applying the theory of coresets to logistic regression. First, we show the negative result that no strongly sublinear sized coresets exist for logistic regression. To deal with intractable worst-case instances we introduce a complexity measure $\mu(X)$, which quantifies the hardness of compressing a data set for logistic regression.
Differentially Private Truncation of Unbounded Data via Public Second Moments
Cao, Zilong, Bi, Xuan, Zhang, Hai
Data privacy is important in the AI era, and differential privacy (DP) is one of the golden solutions. However, DP is typically applicable only if data have a bounded underlying distribution. We address this limitation by leveraging second-moment information from a small amount of public data. We propose Public-moment-guided Truncation (PMT), which transforms private data using the public second-moment matrix and applies a principled truncation whose radius depends only on non-private quantities: data dimension and sample size. This transformation yields a well-conditioned second-moment matrix, enabling its inversion with a significantly strengthened ability to resist the DP noise. Furthermore, we demonstrate the applicability of PMT by using penalized and generalized linear regressions. Specifically, we design new loss functions and algorithms, ensuring that solutions in the transformed space can be mapped back to the original domain. We have established improvements in the models' DP estimation through theoretical error bounds, robustness guarantees, and convergence results, attributing the gains to the conditioning effect of PMT. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets confirm that PMT substantially improves the accuracy and stability of DP models.
- North America > United States > Minnesota (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
Optimal Subsampling with Influence Functions
As the amount of data increases, the question arises as to how best to deal with the large datasets. While computational platforms such as Spark [28] and Ray [23] help process large datasets once a desired model is chosen, simply using smaller data can be a faster solution for exploratory data modeling, rapid prototyping, or other tasks where the accuracy obtainable from the full dataset is notneeded.
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > Scotland > City of Edinburgh > Edinburgh (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.14)
- North America > United States > New Jersey (0.04)
- Europe > Spain > Catalonia > Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- North America > United States > Texas > Harris County > Houston (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Baltimore (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Bavaria > Regensburg (0.04)
- (3 more...)